Get fast, consistent feedback on your PRs—based on your project’s conventions and context.
IgniteDX Bot
Verify that `item.price` is always a number. Consider using `Number(item.price)` or type checking to prevent concatenation bugs.
Manual reviews are essential, but the first pass shouldn't burn your senior engineers' time.
Code sits idle while reviewers are busy, slowing down velocity and causing merge conflicts.
Review quality varies by reviewer, letting simple bugs and style violations slip through.
Senior devs spend hours on syntax and nitpicks instead of focusing on architecture and logic.
It handles the first pass—catching syntax errors, style violations, and obvious bugs—so your team can focus on judgment, architecture, and high-level decisions.
IgniteDX helps reviewers move faster — it doesn't replace human judgment.
AI handles the first pass — humans make the final call. Every review is a starting point for your team, not a bypass.
We only process the PR diff temporarily. No code is stored, executed, or used to train models. Your repository content stays on GitHub.
IgniteDX catches common issues and suggests improvements. It won't find every bug — but it'll catch the ones that waste your team's time.
Reviews appear directly in your GitHub PRs. No new tools, no context switching. Works with private and public repositories.
Up and running in minutes. No complex configuration detailed.
One-click installation. Select your repositories. No manual CI/CD setup required.
Choose review strictness, add project specs, and upload context files like architecture docs.
Review starts automatically. Feedback is posted directly to GitHub as comments.
IgniteDX understands your code, not just the text.
IgniteDX posts structured review comments directly to GitHub — with explanations, severity, and suggested fixes. No context switching.
Every issue is classified by severity so reviewers can focus on what actually matters. No more guessing what's a blocker and what's a nit.
Upload specs, architecture docs, and custom instructions so feedback aligns with your team's actual conventions — not generic rules.
User input is interpolated directly into the SQL query string without parameterization. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL.
Use parameterized queries instead of string interpolation.
The nested property access can be simplified with optional chaining for better readability.
Replace nested access with optional chaining operator.
The async event handler does not have a try-catch block. An unhandled rejection here will crash the process in production.
Add a try-catch block around the async handler body.
✓ Custom rules enabled for this repository
These settings override the project defaults.
Repository-specific instructions that override project defaults.
Files from your repo that help contextualize reviews.
ARCHITECTURE.md
CODING_STANDARDS.md
API_CONVENTIONS.md
3 of 10 files added · 7 slots remaining
Configure how strict the code review should be.
Balances thorough review with practical flexibility, flags genuine issues while avoiding nitpicking.
Not every project needs the same level of scrutiny. Configure it per repository.
Focuses only on critical issues like bugs and crashes. Minimal noise. Perfect for prototyping and fast iteration.
Production-oriented. A healthy mix of blocking critical issues and suggesting code improvements.
Enforces documented standards rigorously. Best for stable, critical codebases where consistency is paramount.
Early adopters using IgniteDX in their daily workflow.
I've really enjoyed using IgniteDX. It has already helped me catch issues before pushing changes, which gives me more confidence in my pull requests and helps improve overall code quality.
Antonio Blancas
FrontEnd Developer at kiban
IgniteDX is easy to use and gives really helpful review comments. It catches best-practice issues and leftover code after refactors, suggests how to fix them, and the review is fast.
Mauricio Mondragón
QA and BackEnd Developer at kiban
IgniteDX has helped me avoid shipping errors in my personal projects. It fits easily into my workflow — whether I'm coding on my own or using vibe coding tools — and adds an extra review layer before production, which gives me much more confidence when deploying.
Fernando Rivas
Indie developer
Start free, then move into paid plans when you need more monthly review capacity, more active projects, or more repositories per project.
For evaluation
No card required
A lightweight starting point for individuals and very small teams validating IgniteDX in a real workflow.
Start for FreeFor growing teams
Billed monthly
More monthly capacity and enough room for multiple active projects without adding operational noise.
Choose StarterFor multi-repo orgs
Billed monthly
Highest monthly capacity for teams running reviews across many repositories, contributors, and parallel pull requests.
Choose ProWhat changes between plans
All plans include PR issue classification, strictness controls, project-specific instructions, and repository context files. Paid tiers expand monthly review capacity and let teams operate across more active projects and repositories without friction.
IgniteDX is still evolving. Pricing, review volumes, and included limits may continue to sharpen as we learn from real production usage, but plan changes will always be communicated clearly in advance.
Be the first to hear about pricing, higher review limits, and early access to premium features.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Security & Privacy
Join the developers using IgniteDX to get faster feedback and cleaner codebases.
